An Experimental-Cohesive Zone Model Approach to Predict Fatigue Life of Adhesive Joints with Varying Modes of Loading and Joint Configurations for Automotive Applications

dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Ahmed Hanafy
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Brock
dc.contributor.authorJahed, Hamid
dc.contributor.authorRezaee, Saeid
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Duane
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-04T19:43:33Z
dc.date.available2025-12-04T19:43:33Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-03
dc.descriptionThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Adhesion on 2024 October 3, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2024.2408372
dc.description.abstractPredictive fatigue life models of adhesive joints are necessary to enable the assessment of automotive bonded structures while reducing costly experimental testing. However, contemporary models have typically been calibrated for specific joint configurations and modes of loading, limiting their applicability to large-scale structures. Additionally, available models are based on simulation of cumulative fatigue cycling, making them computationally prohibitive. In the current study, fatigue experimental tests were undertaken on adhesive joints in cross-tension (CT) (load angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°) and single-lap shear joint (SLJ) configurations. A total of nine joint configurations, having symmetrical (same material and thickness) and asymmetrical (dissimilar material or unequal thickness) joints, were tested. Fatigue tests at load levels between 25-75% of the static peak load were performed until joint failure or to runout (two million load cycles). The static tests of the joints were simulated to failure using finite element (FE) models with the cohesive zone method (CZM). The maximum fracture energy release rates (Gmax) were calculated within the adhesive bond line at static loads corresponding to the peak loads of the fatigue tests. The Gmax values, computed from single cycle, specimen-specific FE simulations, were correlated with the measured fatigue life (Nf) of the adhesive joints with varying modes of loading and joint configurations. The fatigue life prediction model, based on Gmax − Nf correlation, predicted the cycles to failure for 85% of the fatigue tests, and 81% of the independent validation tests. The proposed fatigue life prediction approach provides computational efficiency and large-scale compatibility.
dc.description.sponsorshipRenault Group, Grant REGIENOV DEA-TD-68193-18-169
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2024.2408372
dc.identifier.uri10.1080/00218464.2024.2408372
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10012/22717
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Adhesion; 101(7)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canadaen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/
dc.subjectadhesive fatigue life prediction
dc.subjectadhesive joints in automotive
dc.subjectadhesive cohesive zone model
dc.subjectfatigue testing of adhesive
dc.subjectadhesive finite element model
dc.titleAn Experimental-Cohesive Zone Model Approach to Predict Fatigue Life of Adhesive Joints with Varying Modes of Loading and Joint Configurations for Automotive Applications
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIbrahim, A. H., Watson, B., Jahed, H., Rezaee, S., & Cronin, D. S. (2024). An experimental-cohesive zone model approach to predict fatigue life of adhesive joints with varying modes of loading and joint configurations for automotive applications. The Journal of Adhesion, 101(7), 930–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2024.2408372
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineering
uws.contributor.affiliation2Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering
uws.peerReviewStatusReviewed
uws.scholarLevelGraduate
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ibrahim-2024-An experimental-cohesive zone model approach to predict fatigue life of adhesive joints with varying modes of loading and joint configurations for automotive applications.pdf
Size:
2.91 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: