UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

Brain-State Dependent Stimulation boosts functional recovery following stroke

dc.contributor.authorMrachacz-Kersting, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, Andrew James Thomas
dc.contributor.authorJørgensen, Helle R. M.
dc.contributor.authorSeverinsen, Kåre Eg
dc.contributor.authorAliakbaryhosseinabadi, Susan
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Ning
dc.contributor.authorFarina, Dario
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-16T15:20:25Z
dc.date.available2018-11-16T15:20:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-08
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: “Brain-State Dependent Stimulation boosts functional recovery following stroke”, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25375. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived.en
dc.description.abstractObjective Adjuvant protocols devised to enhance motor recovery in subacute stroke patients have failed to show benefits with respect to classic therapeutic interventions. Here we evaluate the efficacy of a novel brain-state dependent intervention based on known mechanisms of memory and learning, that is integrated as part of the weekly rehabilitation program in subacute stroke patients. Methods Twenty-four hospitalized subacute stroke patients were randomly assigned to two intervention groups; 1. The associative group received thirty pairings of a peripheral electrical nerve stimulus (ES) such that the generated afferent volley arrived precisely during the most active phase of the motor cortex as patients attempted to perform a movement; 2. In the control group the ES intensity was too low to generate a stimulation of the nerve. Functional (including the lower extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (LE-FM; primary outcome measure)) and neurophysiological (changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs)) assessments were performed prior to and following the intervention period. Results The associative group significantly improved functional recovery with respect to the control group (median (interquartile range) LE-FM improvement: 6.5 (3.5-8.25) and 3 (0.75-3), respectively; p=0.029). Significant increases in MEP amplitude were seen following all sessions in the associative group only (p’s≤0.006). Interpretation This is the first evidence of a clinical effect of a neuromodulatory intervention in the subacute phase of stroke. This was evident with relatively few repetitions in comparison to available techniques, making it a clinically-viable approach. The results indicate the potential of the proposed neuromodulation system in daily clinical routine for stroke rehabilitation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipKong Christian den Tiendes Fond (39/2016)en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25375
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/14160
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.subjectStrokeen
dc.subjectCorticalen
dc.subjectPlasticityen
dc.titleBrain-State Dependent Stimulation boosts functional recovery following strokeen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMrachacz‐Kersting, N., Stevenson, A. J. T., Jørgensen, H. R. M., Severinsen, K. E., Aliakbaryhosseinabadi, S., Jiang, N., & Farina, D. (n.d.). Brain-State Dependent Stimulation boosts functional recovery following stroke. Annals of Neurology, (accepted for publication). https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25375en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineeringen
uws.contributor.affiliation2Systems Design Engineeringen
uws.peerReviewStatusRevieweden
uws.scholarLevelFacultyen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 5 of 7
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ANA-18-0464_R2_clean-a.pdf
Size:
243.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Post-print
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Figure_1.tiff
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Tag Image File Format
Description:
Figure 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Figure_2_BW.tiff
Size:
187.73 KB
Format:
Tag Image File Format
Description:
Figure 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Figure_3_BW.tiff
Size:
233.54 KB
Format:
Tag Image File Format
Description:
Figure 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Figure 4_R2.tiff
Size:
2.27 MB
Format:
Tag Image File Format
Description:
Figure 4
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
6.08 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: