A Dynamic Account of the Structure of Concepts

dc.comment.hiddenCorrections to the title page and page numbering have been made.en
dc.contributor.authorBlouw, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-31T19:39:25Z
dc.date.available2011-08-31T19:39:25Z
dc.date.issued2011-08-31T19:39:25Z
dc.date.submitted2011
dc.description.abstractConcepts are widely agreed to be the basic constituents of thought. Amongst philosophers and psychologists, however, the question of how concepts are structured has been a longstanding problem and a locus of disagreement. I draw on recent work describing how representational content is ascribed to populations of neurons to develop a novel solution to this problem. Because disputes over the structure of concepts often reflect divergent explanatory goals, I begin by arguing for a set of six criteria that a good theory ought to accommodate. These criteria address philosophical concerns related to content, reference, scope, publicity, and compositionality, and psychological concerns related to categorization phenomena and neural plausibility. Next, I evaluate a number of existing theoretical approaches in relation to these six criteria. I consider classical views that identify concepts with definitions, similarity-based views that identify concepts with prototypes or exemplars, theory-based views that identify concepts with explanatory schemas, and atomistic views that identify concepts with unstructured mental symbols that enter into law-like relations with their referents. I conclude that none of these accounts can satisfactorily accommodate all of the criteria. I then describe the theory of representational content that I employ to motivate a novel account of concept structure. I briefly defend this theory against competitors, and I describe how it can be scaled from the level of basic perceptual representations to the level of highly complex conceptual representations. On the basis of this description, I contend that concepts are structured dynamically through sets of transformations of single source representation, and that the content of a given concept specifies the set of potential transformations it can enter into. I conclude by demonstrating that the ability of this account to meet all of the criteria introduced beforehand. I consider objections to my views throughout.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/6225
dc.language.isoenen
dc.pendingfalseen
dc.publisherUniversity of Waterlooen
dc.subjectconceptsen
dc.subjectmental representationen
dc.subjectmental contenten
dc.subjectcategorizationen
dc.subjectcompositionalityen
dc.subjectsemantic pointersen
dc.subjectcognitive scienceen
dc.subject.programPhilosophyen
dc.titleA Dynamic Account of the Structure of Conceptsen
dc.typeMaster Thesisen
uws-etd.degreeMaster of Artsen
uws-etd.degree.departmentPhilosophyen
uws.peerReviewStatusUnrevieweden
uws.scholarLevelGraduateen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Blouw_Peter.pdf
Size:
467.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
246 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections