A Dynamic Account of the Structure of Concepts
dc.comment.hidden | Corrections to the title page and page numbering have been made. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Blouw, Peter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-08-31T19:39:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-31T19:39:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-08-31T19:39:25Z | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011 | |
dc.description.abstract | Concepts are widely agreed to be the basic constituents of thought. Amongst philosophers and psychologists, however, the question of how concepts are structured has been a longstanding problem and a locus of disagreement. I draw on recent work describing how representational content is ascribed to populations of neurons to develop a novel solution to this problem. Because disputes over the structure of concepts often reflect divergent explanatory goals, I begin by arguing for a set of six criteria that a good theory ought to accommodate. These criteria address philosophical concerns related to content, reference, scope, publicity, and compositionality, and psychological concerns related to categorization phenomena and neural plausibility. Next, I evaluate a number of existing theoretical approaches in relation to these six criteria. I consider classical views that identify concepts with definitions, similarity-based views that identify concepts with prototypes or exemplars, theory-based views that identify concepts with explanatory schemas, and atomistic views that identify concepts with unstructured mental symbols that enter into law-like relations with their referents. I conclude that none of these accounts can satisfactorily accommodate all of the criteria. I then describe the theory of representational content that I employ to motivate a novel account of concept structure. I briefly defend this theory against competitors, and I describe how it can be scaled from the level of basic perceptual representations to the level of highly complex conceptual representations. On the basis of this description, I contend that concepts are structured dynamically through sets of transformations of single source representation, and that the content of a given concept specifies the set of potential transformations it can enter into. I conclude by demonstrating that the ability of this account to meet all of the criteria introduced beforehand. I consider objections to my views throughout. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10012/6225 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.pending | false | en |
dc.publisher | University of Waterloo | en |
dc.subject | concepts | en |
dc.subject | mental representation | en |
dc.subject | mental content | en |
dc.subject | categorization | en |
dc.subject | compositionality | en |
dc.subject | semantic pointers | en |
dc.subject | cognitive science | en |
dc.subject.program | Philosophy | en |
dc.title | A Dynamic Account of the Structure of Concepts | en |
dc.type | Master Thesis | en |
uws-etd.degree | Master of Arts | en |
uws-etd.degree.department | Philosophy | en |
uws.peerReviewStatus | Unreviewed | en |
uws.scholarLevel | Graduate | en |
uws.typeOfResource | Text | en |