Optimal product replacement: The dark sides of technological progress and the circular economy
| dc.contributor.author | Chenavaz, Regis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dimitrov, Stanko | |
| dc.contributor.author | Figge, Frank | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schlosser, Rainer | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-04T19:04:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-04T19:04:18Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-06-30 | |
| dc.description | The final publication is available at Elsevier via https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108341. © 2025. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.description.abstract | The intersection of the circular economy and technological obsolescence is pivotal for understanding sustainable consumption and innovation's impacts on product lifecycle management. Prevailing literature emphasizes producer-driven obsolescence and often overlooks the consumer's role in product replacement designs, particularly in a circular economic context. This study bridges this gap by exploring consumer-driven economic obsolescence and the resulting implications for product longevity and replacement strategies. Employing a composite methodology that integrates economic modeling with net present value analysis, this article investigates the timing of optimal product replacement from the consumer perspective. It challenges the conventional minimum cost per unit time methods by introducing a profit-equating replacement strategy tailored to circular economy principles. Key findings reveal a paradoxical dynamic wherein increased technological advancement can inversely affect optimal replacement timing, underscoring a consumer-centric view of obsolescence. Conclusively, this research refines our understanding of obsolescence by reconstructing its economic rationale within the circular economy, thus offering nuanced insights for sustainable product lifecycle management and policy-making. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108341 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10012/22343 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Resources, Conservation and Recycling; 220; 108341 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | product replacement | |
| dc.subject | technological progress | |
| dc.subject | circular economy | |
| dc.subject | consumer-driven obsolescence | |
| dc.title | Optimal product replacement: The dark sides of technological progress and the circular economy | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Chenavaz, R., Dimitrov, S., Figge, F., & Schlosser, R. (2025). Optimal product replacement: The dark sides of technological progress and the circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 220, 108341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108341 | |
| uws.contributor.affiliation1 | Faculty of Engineering | |
| uws.contributor.affiliation2 | Management Sciences | |
| uws.peerReviewStatus | Reviewed | |
| uws.scholarLevel | Faculty | |
| uws.typeOfResource | Text | en |