Optimal product replacement: The dark sides of technological progress and the circular economy

dc.contributor.authorChenavaz, Regis
dc.contributor.authorDimitrov, Stanko
dc.contributor.authorFigge, Frank
dc.contributor.authorSchlosser, Rainer
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-04T19:04:18Z
dc.date.available2025-09-04T19:04:18Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-30
dc.descriptionThe final publication is available at Elsevier via https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108341. © 2025. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.description.abstractThe intersection of the circular economy and technological obsolescence is pivotal for understanding sustainable consumption and innovation's impacts on product lifecycle management. Prevailing literature emphasizes producer-driven obsolescence and often overlooks the consumer's role in product replacement designs, particularly in a circular economic context. This study bridges this gap by exploring consumer-driven economic obsolescence and the resulting implications for product longevity and replacement strategies. Employing a composite methodology that integrates economic modeling with net present value analysis, this article investigates the timing of optimal product replacement from the consumer perspective. It challenges the conventional minimum cost per unit time methods by introducing a profit-equating replacement strategy tailored to circular economy principles. Key findings reveal a paradoxical dynamic wherein increased technological advancement can inversely affect optimal replacement timing, underscoring a consumer-centric view of obsolescence. Conclusively, this research refines our understanding of obsolescence by reconstructing its economic rationale within the circular economy, thus offering nuanced insights for sustainable product lifecycle management and policy-making.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108341
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10012/22343
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResources, Conservation and Recycling; 220; 108341
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectproduct replacement
dc.subjecttechnological progress
dc.subjectcircular economy
dc.subjectconsumer-driven obsolescence
dc.titleOptimal product replacement: The dark sides of technological progress and the circular economy
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChenavaz, R., Dimitrov, S., Figge, F., & Schlosser, R. (2025). Optimal product replacement: The dark sides of technological progress and the circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 220, 108341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108341
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineering
uws.contributor.affiliation2Management Sciences
uws.peerReviewStatusReviewed
uws.scholarLevelFaculty
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Opportunity_Cost_2.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: