UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

Comparison of a new portable digital meniscometer and optical coherence tomography in tear meniscus radius measurement

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2013-10-07

Authors

Bandlitz, Stefan
Purslow, Christine
Murphy, Paul J.
Pult, Heiko

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley

Abstract

Purpose: Non-invasive measurement of tear meniscus radius (TMR) is useful in the assessment of tear volume for dry eye diagnosis. This study investigates the agreement between a new, portable, slit-lamp mounted, digital meniscometer (PDM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the measurement of human TMR. Methods: Images of the tear meniscus at the centre of the lower lid of 30 normal subjects (8M, 22F; mean age 27.5 SD ± 9.6 years) were taken using the PDM and the OCT. On the PDM and OCT images, TMR was measured using imagej 1.46b software. The meniscus on the OCT images was subdivided vertically into three equal sections and the radius calculated for each: bottom (BTMR), centre (CTMR) and top (TTMR). The relationship between PDM and OCT measurements was analysed using Spearman's rank coefficient, and differences between PDM and OCT subsection measurements were evaluated using Bland–Altman plots. Results: Tear meniscus radius measured with the PDM (0.25 ± 0.06 mm) and OCT (0.29 ± 0.09 mm) was significantly correlated (r = 0.675; p < 0.001). The mean differences between TMR using the PDM and the subsections from OCT showed that TMR measured with PDM was greater for BTMR (0.07 mm; CI 0.05–0.10; p < 0.001), similar for CTMR (−0.01 mm; CI −0.04 to 0.02; p = 0.636) and steeper for TTMR (−0.07 mm; CI −0.10 to −0.04; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Portable digital meniscometer and OCT measurements of the TMR are significantly correlated, suggesting that the new PDM is a useful surrogate for OCT in this respect. The PDM appears to measure the radius of the central section of the tear meniscus.

Description

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: "Bandlitz, S., Purslow, C., Murphy, P. J., & Pult, H. (2014). Comparison of a new portable digital meniscometer and optical coherence tomography in tear meniscus radius measurement. Acta Ophthalmologica, 92(2), e112–e118., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12275. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Keywords

Optical coherence tomography, Portable digital meniscometer, Reflective menisc, ometry, Tear meniscus radius, Tear volume

LC Keywords

Citation