Environemental impacts of laboratory and scientific equipment: Focus on equipment operation and procurement

dc.contributor.authorCimprich, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorKasaeipour, Sahand
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Steven B.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-15T18:58:54Z
dc.date.issued2026-08-20
dc.description© 2026 Cimprich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.description.abstractClimate change and environmental sustainability are major priorities across scientific and policy domains. Scientists themselves are starting to recognize that their own activities have direct and indirect environmental impacts. These impacts result from things like material and energy use and waste generation in conducting scientific research, particularly in laboratories. In this article, we build upon growing efforts to measure and manage these environmental impacts by conducting cradle-to-grave life cycle assessments (LCAs) of widely used scientific and laboratory equipment. We considered over 3000 pieces of equipment used by Government of Canada laboratories. Our study contributes in four ways. First, although previous work has examined laboratory consumables and other impact drivers like building energy consumption and transportation, our study draws attention to the environmental impacts of laboratory and scientific equipment. Second, our study demonstrates a novel approach for screening large and varied sets of equipment-level LCA results to sustainability transformations by highlighting leverage points informed by the life cycle profile of equipment. Our results suggest a tendency for laboratory and scientific equipment to be use-intensive (as seen, e.g., in the case of refrigerators and freezers where the use stage accounts for approximately 97% of life cycle GHG emissions). However, this life cycle profile varies across environmental indicators (e.g., climate change, acidification, smog formation, and ecological toxicity) and with changes in equipment usage frequency (i.e., hours per year in operation). Some equipment, like scanning electron microscopes, can be production-intensive. These findings suggest that sustainability transformations for laboratory equipment need to consider the life cycle profile of the equipment and involve leverage points beyond procurement decisions.
dc.description.sponsorshipGovernment of Canada - Public Works and Government Services Canada, no. 700789097.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000271
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10012/24529
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLOS)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLOS Sustainability and Transformation; 5(8); e0000271
dc.subjectlaboratory equipment
dc.subjectlife cycles
dc.subjectenvironmental impacts
dc.subjectimaging equipment
dc.subjectequipment
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopes
dc.subjectelectricity
dc.subjectgovernment laboratories
dc.titleEnvironemental impacts of laboratory and scientific equipment: Focus on equipment operation and procurement
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCimprich A, Kasaeipour S, Young SB (2026) Environmental impacts of laboratory and scientific equipment: Focus on equipment operation and procurement. PLOS Sustain Transform 5(8): e0000271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000271
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Environment
uws.contributor.affiliation2School of Environment, Enterprise and Development
uws.peerReviewStatusReviewed
uws.scholarLevelFaculty
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pstr.0000271.pdf
Size:
1.21 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: