Technical comment on “Reexamination of 2.5-Ga ‘whiff’ of oxygen interval points to anoxic ocean before GOE”

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAnbar, Ariel
dc.contributor.authorBuick, Roger
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Gwyneth
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Aleisha
dc.contributor.authorKendall, Brian
dc.contributor.authorLyons, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorOstrander, Chadlin
dc.contributor.authorPlanavsky, Noah
dc.contributor.authorReinhard, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorStueken, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-30T14:03:45Z
dc.date.available2023-10-30T14:03:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-07
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2023 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.description.abstractMany lines of inorganic geochemical evidence suggest transient “whiffs” of environmental oxygenation before the Great Oxidation Event (GOE). Slotznick et al. assert that analyses of paleoredox proxies in the Mount McRae Shale, Western Australia, were misinterpreted and hence that environmental O2 levels were persistently negligible before the GOE. We find these arguments logically flawed and factually incomplete.en
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank the NASA Astrobiology Program and Canada Research Chairs Program for supporting work on this comment.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq3736
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/20073
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherScienceen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSciences Advances;9(14)
dc.titleTechnical comment on “Reexamination of 2.5-Ga ‘whiff’ of oxygen interval points to anoxic ocean before GOE”en
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnbar, A. D., Buick, R., Gordon, G. W., Johnson, A. C., Kendall, B., Lyons, T. W., Ostrander, C. M., Planavsky, N. J., Reinhard, C. T., & Stüeken, E. E. (2023). Technical comment on “reexamination of 2.5-ga ‘whiff’ of oxygen interval points to anoxic ocean before GOE.” Science Advances, 9(14). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq3736en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Scienceen
uws.contributor.affiliation2Earth and Environmental Sciencesen
uws.peerReviewStatusRevieweden
uws.scholarLevelFacultyen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
54 - Anbar et al. (2023) Science Advances.pdf
Size:
410.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Waterloo Research