UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

Optimal Material Selection for Transducers

dc.contributor.authorSeviora, Gregory
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-15T18:01:36Z
dc.date.available2018-02-15T18:01:36Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-15
dc.date.submitted2017-12-11
dc.description.abstractWhen selecting an active material for an application, it is tempting to rely upon prior knowledge or commercial products that fit the design criteria. While this method is time effective, it does not provide an optimal selection. The optimal material selection requires an understanding of the limitations of the active material, understanding of the function, constraints and objectives of the device, and rigorous decision making method to ensure rational and clear material selection can be performed. Therefore, this work looks into the three most researched active materials (piezoelectrics, magnetostrictives and shape memory alloys) and looks at how they work and their difficulties. The field of piezoelectrics is vast and contains ceramics, plastics and cellular structures that couple the mechanical and electrical domain. The difficulty with piezoelectric ceramics is their small strains and the dependence of their coefficients on the ferroelectric domains. Giant magnetostrictives materials couple the mechanical and magnetic domains. They are generally better suited for low-frequency operations since they properties deteriorate rapidly with heat. Shape memory alloys are materials that couple thermal and mechanical domains. They have large strain but are limited in their force output, fatigue life and cycle frequency. Optimal material selection requires a formalized material selection method. In mechanical material selection, the formal material selection method uses function, constraints and objectives of the designer to limit the parameter space and allow better decisions. Unfortunately, active materials figures of merit are domain dependent and therefore the mechanical material selection method needs to be adapted. A review of device selection of actuators, sensors and energy harvesters indicates a list of functions, constrains and objectives that the designer can use. Through the analysis of these devices figures of merit, it is realized that the issue is that the simplification that the figures of merit perform does not assist in decision making process. It is better to use decision making methods that have been developed in the field of operational research which assists complex comparative decision making. Finally, the decision making methods are applied to two applications: a resonant cantilever energy harvester and an ultrasound transducer. In both these cases, a review of selection methods of other designers provides guidance of important figures of merit. With these selection methods in consideration, figures of merit are selected and used to find the optimal material based upon the designer preference.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/13003
dc.language.isoenen
dc.pendingfalse
dc.publisherUniversity of Waterlooen
dc.subjectMaterial Selectionen
dc.subjectPiezoelectricen
dc.subjectMagnetostrictiveen
dc.subjectShape Memory Alloysen
dc.subjectSMAsen
dc.subjectMCDMen
dc.subjectActuatorsen
dc.subjectSensorsen
dc.subjectEnergy Harvestersen
dc.titleOptimal Material Selection for Transducersen
dc.typeMaster Thesisen
uws-etd.degreeMaster of Applied Scienceen
uws-etd.degree.departmentMechanical and Mechatronics Engineeringen
uws-etd.degree.disciplineMechanical Engineeringen
uws-etd.degree.grantorUniversity of Waterlooen
uws.contributor.advisorYavuz, Mustafa
uws.contributor.advisorAbdel-Rahman, Eihab
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineeringen
uws.peerReviewStatusUnrevieweden
uws.published.cityWaterlooen
uws.published.countryCanadaen
uws.published.provinceOntarioen
uws.scholarLevelGraduateen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Seviora_Gregory.pdf
Size:
8.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis Document
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
6.08 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: