Design and development of a disease-agnostic remote patient monitoring typology and associated tools

dc.contributor.authorAbejirinde, Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade
dc.contributor.authorKishimoto, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorBrual, Janette
dc.contributor.authorPfisterer, Kaylen J.
dc.contributor.authorUddin, Nishath
dc.contributor.authorPratt, Taylor
dc.contributor.authorFleury. Cathleen
dc.contributor.authorOsman, Azza
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharyya, Onil
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-15T17:24:51Z
dc.date.issued2026-07-31
dc.description© 2026 Abejirinde et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.description.abstractRemote patient monitoring (RPM) expanded dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic and continues to be implemented. However, no standardized method for classifying them exists which has implication for comparative evaluations. Our goal was to design and develop a disease-agnostic RPM typology tool as a first step towards a standardized approach for understanding and implementing RPM programs for different clinical use-cases. Guided by the Knowledge-To-Action framework, we conducted a rapid review of RPM programs from Canada, the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, and Australia that were used to manage diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive health failure, hypertension, and COVID-19. We identified 87 articles to define common characteristics of real-world RPM interventions to enable comparison across different programs through pattern recognition, information mapping, and sensemaking. We extracted data with a macros-enabled Excel template. Design sessions with key stakeholders (researchers, clinical advisors, provincial RPM managers, and patient partners) provided iterative feedback on the typology and we defined a glossary of characteristics. The 12 most reported characteristics of RPM programs (including size, resources, monitoring team, data flow, alert protocol, workflow, and equity considerations) were clustered into four domains. Integration and equity domains were considered to exist on a spectrum from low-to-high- neither inherently superior to the other. 16 distinct RPM typologies were expressed through a 4x4 matrix (i.e., high or low on each of the four domains). Using this tool can inform insights on program maturity, implementation, and continued investments in RPM. We anticipate this typology will help new initiatives have greater potential to be robustly evaluated and sustained to scale. Future directions include further validity testing and exploring feasibility to systematically categorise real-world RPM programs with this tool.
dc.description.sponsorshipOntario Ministry of Health.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001595
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10012/24520
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Lirbary of Science (PLOS)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS Digital Health; 5(7); e0001595
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCOVID 19
dc.subjectvendors
dc.subjectcomputer software
dc.subjectdata management
dc.subjectmedical risk factors
dc.subjectmeasurement equipment
dc.subjectmedical devices and equipment
dc.subjectpatients
dc.titleDesign and development of a disease-agnostic remote patient monitoring typology and associated tools
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAbejirinde I-OO, Kishimoto V, Brual J, Pfisterer KJ, Uddin N, Pratt T, et al. (2026) Design and development of a disease-agnostic remote patient monitoring typology and associated tools. PLOS Digit Health 5(7): e0001595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001595
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineering
uws.contributor.affiliation2Systems Design Engineering
uws.peerReviewStatusReviewed
uws.scholarLevelFaculty
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pdig.0001595.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.47 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: