Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnbar, Ariel
dc.contributor.authorBuick, Roger
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Gwyneth
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Aleisha
dc.contributor.authorKendall, Brian
dc.contributor.authorLyons, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorOstrander, Chadlin
dc.contributor.authorPlanavsky, Noah
dc.contributor.authorReinhard, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorStueken, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-30 14:03:45 (GMT)
dc.date.available2023-10-30 14:03:45 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2023-04-07
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq3736
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/20073
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2023 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.description.abstractMany lines of inorganic geochemical evidence suggest transient “whiffs” of environmental oxygenation before the Great Oxidation Event (GOE). Slotznick et al. assert that analyses of paleoredox proxies in the Mount McRae Shale, Western Australia, were misinterpreted and hence that environmental O2 levels were persistently negligible before the GOE. We find these arguments logically flawed and factually incomplete.en
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank the NASA Astrobiology Program and Canada Research Chairs Program for supporting work on this comment.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherScienceen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSciences Advances;9(14)
dc.titleTechnical comment on “Reexamination of 2.5-Ga ‘whiff’ of oxygen interval points to anoxic ocean before GOE”en
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnbar, A. D., Buick, R., Gordon, G. W., Johnson, A. C., Kendall, B., Lyons, T. W., Ostrander, C. M., Planavsky, N. J., Reinhard, C. T., & Stüeken, E. E. (2023). Technical comment on “reexamination of 2.5-ga ‘whiff’ of oxygen interval points to anoxic ocean before GOE.” Science Advances, 9(14). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq3736en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Scienceen
uws.contributor.affiliation2Earth and Environmental Sciencesen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusRevieweden
uws.scholarLevelFacultyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages