Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorObaid, Juwairia
dc.contributor.authorRamadan, Ashraf
dc.contributor.authorElkamel, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, William A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-09 20:01:12 (GMT)
dc.date.available2022-06-09 20:01:12 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2017-02-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/en10020179
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/18374
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the emissions of various industrial facilities under start-up, shut-down, and normal operations. The industries that have been investigated include power and/or heat generation, energy-from-waste generation, nuclear power generation, sulphuric acid production, ethylene production, petrochemical production, and waste incineration. The study investigated multiple facilities worldwide for each of these industrial categories. The different potential contaminants characteristic of each industry type have been investigated and the emissions of these contaminants under non-steady state have been compared to the steady state emissions. Where available, trends have been developed to identify the circumstances, i.e., the industrial sector and contaminant, under which the assessment and consideration of emissions from start-up and shut-down events is necessary for each industry. These trends differ by industrial sector and contaminant. For example, the study shows that sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions should be assessed for the start-up operations of sulphuric acid production plants, but may not need to be assessed for the start-up operations of a conventional power generation facility. The trends developed as part of this research paper will help air permit applicants to effectively allocate their resources when assessing emissions related to non-steady state operations. Additionally, it will ensure that emissions are assessed for the worst-case scenario. This is especially important when emissions under start-up and shut-down operations have the potential to exceed enforceable emission limits. Thus, assessing emissions for the worst-case scenario can help in preventing the emissions from adversely impacting public health and the environment.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectdynamicen
dc.subjectemissionsen
dc.subjectnon-steady stateen
dc.subjectshut-downen
dc.subjectstart-upen
dc.titleComparing Non-Steady State Emissions under Start-Up and Shut-Down Operating Conditions with Steady State Emissions for Several Industrial Sectors: A Literature Reviewen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationObaid, J., Ramadan, A., Elkamel, A., & Anderson, W. (2017). Comparing Non-Steady State Emissions under Start-Up and Shut-Down Operating Conditions with Steady State Emissions for Several Industrial Sectors: A Literature Review. Energies, 10(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10020179en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineeringen
uws.contributor.affiliation2Chemical Engineeringen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusRevieweden
uws.scholarLevelFacultyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages