UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

A Comparison of the Declarative Modelling Languages B, Dash, and TLA+

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2019-08

Authors

Abbassi, Ali
Bandali, Amin
Day, Nancy
Serna, Jose

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

IEEE

Abstract

Declarative behavioural modelling is a powerful modelling paradigm that enables users to model system func- tionality abstractly and concisely. We compare two well-used formal declarative modelling languages, B and TLA+, with a new modelling language called Dash. Dash is an extension of Alloy with explicit syntactic constructs for modelling transition systems, and it includes control state hierarchy and events. Particular topics that we cover in our comparison are: differences in the datatypes and type systems; how the transitions/operations can be described; how the transition relation is a combination of the transitions; and the default choice each language makes regarding permitted variable changes in a transition. Our goal is to discuss the interesting differentiating characteristics of each language to aid users in determining which language is the most suitable for their system.

Description

Keywords

formal specification, formal verification, software engineering, software quality, systems analysis, object-oriented programming, software architecture, grammars, learning, public domain software, declarative modelling, comparison, transition system

LC Keywords

Citation