Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChuang, Tyler
dc.contributor.authorAcker, Stacey
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-04 19:12:22 (GMT)
dc.date.available2019-01-04 19:12:22 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.11.014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/14312
dc.descriptionThe final publication is available at Elsevier via https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.11.014. © 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.description.abstractThere is no consensus on the most appropriate method for normalizing an individual’s electromyography (EMG) signals from walking, cycling and running in the same data collection. The aim of this study was to compare how the magnitude and repeatability of normalization values differ from three normalization methods and to compare their scaling effect in three moderate intensity activities. Three rounds of maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs), sprint cycling and sprint running were performed to obtain normalization values for each method. EMG from five moderate intensity trials of walking, cycling and running were performed and normalized using each normalization value. Normalization values, coefficients of variation, and peak normalized EMG from the three moderate intensity activities were compared across normalization methods. Sprint running resulted in greater normalization values for 6/9 muscles. MVICs produced the lowest variance in 6/9 muscles. Comparing peak normalized signals of interest across normalization methods, there were significant differences in 6/9, 7/9 and 8/9 muscles for walking, cycling and running, respectively. When investigating a combination of walking, cycling and/or running EMG data, sprint running could be used for normalization, due to its simplicity and its ability to produce a larger normalization value, despite lower repeatability.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectelectromyographyen
dc.subjectnormalizationen
dc.subjectrunningen
dc.subjectcyclingen
dc.subjectlower limben
dc.titleComparing functional dynamic normalization methods to maximal voluntary isometric contractions for lower limb EMG from walking, cycling and runningen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationT.D. Chuang, S.M. Acker, Comparing Functional Dynamic Normalization Methods to Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contractions for Lower Limb EMG from Walking, Cycling and Running, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.11.014en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Applied Health Sciencesen
uws.contributor.affiliation2Kinesiologyen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusRevieweden
uws.scholarLevelFacultyen
uws.scholarLevelGraduateen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages