Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhor, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Duane S.
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Brock
dc.contributor.authorGierczycka, Donata
dc.contributor.authorMalcolm, Skye
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-26 17:13:52 (GMT)
dc.date.available2018-10-26 17:13:52 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2018-11-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.033
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/14072
dc.descriptionThe final publication is available at Elsevier via https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.033 © 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.description.abstractModeling of cortical bone response and failure is critical for the prediction of Crash Induced Injuries (CII) using advanced finite element (FE) Human Body Models (HBM). Although cortical bone is anisotropic and asymmetric in tension and compression, current HBM often utilize simple isotropic, symmetric, elastic-plastic constitutive models. In this study, a 50th percentile male femur FE model was used to quantify the effect of asymmetry and anisotropy in three-point bending and axial torsion. A complete set of cortical bone mechanical properties was identified from a literature review, and the femur model was used to investigate the importance of material asymmetry and anisotropy on the failure load/moment, failure displacement/rotation and fracture pattern. All models were able to predict failure load in bending, since this was dominated by the cortical bone material tensile response. However, only the orthotropic model was able to predict the torsional response and failure moment. Only the orthotropic model predicted the fracture initiation location and fracture pattern in bending, and the fracture initiation location in torsion; however, the anticipated spiral fracture pattern was not predicted by the models for torsional loading. The results demonstrated that asymmetry did not significantly improve the prediction capability, and that orthotropic material model with the identified material properties was able to predict the kinetics and kinematics for both three-point bending and axial torsion. This will help to provide an improved method for modeling hard tissue response and failure in full HBM.en
dc.description.sponsorshipHonda R&D Americasen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectHuman body modelen
dc.subjectConstitutive modelen
dc.subjectFemuren
dc.subjectFinite element modelen
dc.subjectFracture patternen
dc.subjectHard tissueen
dc.titleImportance of asymmetry and anisotropy in predicting cortical bone response and fracture using human body model femur in three-point bending and axial rotationen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKhor, F., Cronin, D. S., Watson, B., Gierczycka, D., & Malcolm, S. (2018). Importance of asymmetry and anisotropy in predicting cortical bone response and fracture using human body model femur in three-point bending and axial rotation. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 87, 213–229. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.033en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineeringen
uws.contributor.affiliation2Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineeringen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusRevieweden
uws.scholarLevelFacultyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages