Fate of Adsorbed U(VI) during Sulfidization of Lepidocrocite and Hematite
Loading...
Files
Date
2017-02-21
Authors
Alexandratos, Vasso G.
Behrends, Thilo
Van Cappellen, Philippe
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Chemical Society
Abstract
The impact on U(VI) adsorbed to lepidocrocite (gamma-FeOOH) and hematite (alpha-Fe2O3) was assessed when exposed to aqueous sulfide (S(II)(aq)) at pH 8.0. With both minerals, competition between S(-II) and U(VI) for surface sites caused instantaneous release of adsorbed U(VI). Compared to lepidocrocite, consumption of S(-II)(aq) proceeded slower with hematite, but yielded maximum dissolved U concentrations that were more than 10 times higher, representing about one-third of the initially adsorbed U. Prolonged presence of S(-II)(aq) in experiments with hematite in combination with a larger release of adsorbed U(VI), enhanced the reduction of U(VI): after 24 h of reaction about 60-70% of U was in the form of U(W), much higher than the 2S% detected in the lepidocrocite suspensions. X-ray absorption spectra indicated that U(IV) in both hematite and lepidocrocite suspensions was not in the form of uraninite (UO2). Upon exposure to oxygen only part of U(IV) reoxidized, suggesting that monomeric U(W) might have become incorporated newly formed iron precipitates. sulfidization of Fe oxides can have diverse consequences for U mobility: in short-term, desorption of U(VI) increases U mobility, while reduction to U(W) and its possible incorporation in Fe transformation products may lead to long-term U immobilization.
Description
Keywords
Ray-Absorption Spectroscopy, Goethite Alpha-Feooh, Acid-Sulfate Soil, Surface Complexation, Dissolved Sulfide, Reductive Immobilization, Uranium(Vi) Adsorption, Contaminated Aquifer, Noncrystalline U(Iv), Hexavalent Uranium