Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiraino, Emily
dc.contributor.authorHeckman, George A.
dc.contributor.authorGlenny, Christine
dc.contributor.authorStolee, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21 14:37:08 (GMT)
dc.date.available2017-04-21 14:37:08 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2012-09-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3601531/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/11709
dc.description.abstractObjective: Older adults are at risk of rehospitalization if their care transitions from hospital-to-home are not properly managed. The objective of this review was to determine if older patient populations recruited for randomized controlled trials of transitional care interventions represented those at greatest risk of rehospitalization following discharge. Relevant risk factors examined were cognitive impairment, depression, polypharmacy, comorbidity, length of stay, advanced non-malignant diseases, and available social support. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Hospital to home. Participants: Older hospitalized adults. Measurements: For inclusion, articles were required to focus on hospital-to-home transitions with a self-care component, have components occurring both before and after discharge, and a randomized controlled trial design. Articles were excluded if participants had a mean age under 55 years, or if interventions focused on developmental disabilities, youth, addictions, or case management, or were solely primary-care based. Results: Following title, abstract, and full review by two authors, 17 articles met inclusion criteria. Risk factors for rehospitalization were often listed either as exclusion criteria or were not reported at baseline by the studies. One study included patients with all identified risk factors for rehospitalization. Conclusions: These data suggest that published studies of transitional care interventions do not often include older adults at highest risk of rehospitalization, raising concerns about the generalizability of their results. Studies are needed that evaluate interventions that explicitly address the needs and characteristics of these patients.en
dc.description.sponsorshipEmerging Team Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Researchen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUbiquity Pressen
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 Unported*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/*
dc.subjectCare Transitionsen
dc.subjectChronic Illnessen
dc.subjectClinical-Trialen
dc.subjectCognitive Impairmenten
dc.subjectComorbidityen
dc.subjectElderly Medical Patientsen
dc.subjectFunctional Declineen
dc.subjectHeart-Failure Managementen
dc.subjectHospitalized Eldersen
dc.subjectRandomized-Controlled-Trialen
dc.subjectRehospitalizationen
dc.subjectSelf-Careen
dc.subjectSelf-Managementen
dc.subjectSocial Supporten
dc.subjectSystematic Reviewen
dc.titleTransitional care programs: who is left behind? A systematic reviewen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPiraino, E., Heckman, G., Glenny, C., & Stolee, P. (2012). Transitional care programs: who is left behind? A systematic review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 12.en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Applied Health Sciencesen
uws.contributor.affiliation2School of Public Health and Health Systemsen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusRevieweden
uws.scholarLevelFacultyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 Unported
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 Unported

UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages