UWSpace staff members will be away from May 5th to 9th, 2025. We will not be responding to emails during this time. If there are any urgent issues, please contact GSPA at gsrecord@uwaterloo.ca. If any login or authentication issues arise during this time, please wait until UWSpace Staff members return on May 12th for support.
 

Syntactic Complexities of Nine Subclasses of Regular Languages

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2012-07-31T19:07:45Z

Authors

Li, Baiyu

Advisor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Waterloo

Abstract

The syntactic complexity of a regular language is the cardinality of its syntactic semigroup. The syntactic complexity of a subclass of the class of regular languages is the maximal syntactic complexity of languages in that class, taken as a function of the state complexity n of these languages. We study the syntactic complexity of suffix-, bifix-, and factor-free regular languages, star-free languages including three subclasses, and R- and J-trivial regular languages. We found upper bounds on the syntactic complexities of these classes of languages. For R- and J-trivial regular languages, the upper bounds are n! and ⌊e(n-1)!⌋, respectively, and they are tight for n >= 1. Let C^n_k be the binomial coefficient ``n choose k''. For monotonic languages, the tight upper bound is C^{2n-1}_n. We also found tight upper bounds for partially monotonic and nearly monotonic languages. For the other classes of languages, we found tight upper bounds for languages with small state complexities, and we exhibited languages with maximal known syntactic complexities. We conjecture these lower bounds to be tight upper bounds for these languages. We also observed that, for some subclasses C of regular languages, the upper bound on state complexity of the reversal operation on languages in C can be met by languages in C with maximal syntactic complexity. For R- and J-trivial regular languages, we also determined tight upper bounds on the state complexity of the reversal operation.

Description

Keywords

finite automaton, monoid, regular language, semigroup, state complexity, syntactic complexity

LC Subject Headings

Citation