Local and landscape drivers of aquatic biodiversity in urban stormwater management facilities

dc.contributor.authorMcIsaac, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-20T17:05:20Z
dc.date.available2022-05-20T17:05:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-20
dc.date.submitted2022-05-18
dc.description.abstractStormwater management facilities (SWMFs) are often constructed in urban areas to provide flood mitigation and runoff control, and thus replace some wetland functions. Yet, their suitability as habitat for wetland biota is contested. My research objective was to identify the important local- and landscape-level factors most likely influencing habitat suitability of SWMFs in Brampton, Ontario for two widely-used wetland bioindicators: fish and anurans. I discovered that fish were prevalent (60% of sites), though richness was low (average 1 species per site, 6 species total). Low richness likely reflected poor habitat and/or water quality (shrubs and chloride ions), as well as habitat isolation (i.e., ponds do not directly link to streams). Fish communities were composed of native warm-water tolerant, benthivorous species (e.g., fathead minnows), but 20% of sites also included relatively abundant omnivorous, invasive goldfish. Anurans were also prevalent (95% of sites) in SWMFs, with low richness (average 1.5 species per site, 6 species total). Both anuran composition and species richness were related to the extent of robust emergent vegetation (e.g., cattail). When I compared the anuran community composition and species richness in SWMFs to natural wetlands in the surrounding area, I discovered surprising similarity. Differences included that SWMFs support lower diversity overall, with natural wetlands supporting spring peepers and wood frogs that were absent from SWMFs, and SWMFs supporting American bullfrogs that were not detected in natural wetlands. I conclude that SWMFs do provide important ecological habitat to aquatic biota in urban areas and that promoting robust emergent vegetation and improving water quality in SWMFs could increase their habitat value. I contend that SWMFs and not suitable compensation or replacement for natural wetlands, but they should be considered novel ecosystems and incorporated into regional planning for the conservation of urban biodiversity.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/18309
dc.language.isoenen
dc.pendingfalse
dc.publisherUniversity of Waterlooen
dc.subjectAnuranen
dc.subjectFishen
dc.subjectUrbanen
dc.subjectBiodiversityen
dc.titleLocal and landscape drivers of aquatic biodiversity in urban stormwater management facilitiesen
dc.typeMaster Thesisen
uws-etd.degreeMaster of Scienceen
uws-etd.degree.departmentBiologyen
uws-etd.degree.disciplineBiologyen
uws-etd.degree.grantorUniversity of Waterlooen
uws-etd.embargo.terms0en
uws.contributor.advisorRooney, Rebecca
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Scienceen
uws.peerReviewStatusUnrevieweden
uws.published.cityWaterlooen
uws.published.countryCanadaen
uws.published.provinceOntarioen
uws.scholarLevelGraduateen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
McIsaac_Daniel.pdf
Size:
2.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Resubmission

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
6.4 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections