UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

Where Have You Been, What Did You See, and How Did You Get Here: Effects of Prior Trial History in the Context of Exogenous and Endogenous Spatial Cuing

dc.contributor.authorWhite, Darcy
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-29T17:38:04Z
dc.date.available2015-08-30T05:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-29
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.description.abstractThree spatial cuing experiments assessed whether the nature of the prior trial affects performance in a two choice target identification task. In Experiment 1 current trial RT was strongly affected by whether prior trial cue validity, prior trial target identity, and prior trial target location were the same as on the current trial when an exogenous spatial cue was 50% valid. Experiment 2 demonstrates that, with an endogenous cue, current trial RT was also affected by whether target identity or target location changed from the prior trial. Finally, in Experiment 3 when the cue was exogenous and cue validity was 75%, current trial RT was only affected by the target’s identity on the prior trial. It is concluded that (a) the effects of prior trial history reflect yet another context in which the effects of exogenous and endogenous spatial cuing differ, and (b) the difference in RT to a target preceded by a valid or invalid cue does not reflect a pure measure of spatial attention. Instead, participants appear to weigh information from all dimensions on the previous trial when identifying the target on the current trial. An analysis of the RT distributions yielded significant differences with respect to where in the distribution each factor affected performance. Overall, these data demonstrate that both prior trial effects and analyses of RT distributions of such effects are a rich source of systematic variance that merits further investigation and theoretical consideration.en
dc.description.embargoterms1 yearen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/8744
dc.language.isoenen
dc.pendingfalse
dc.publisherUniversity of Waterlooen
dc.subjectspatial attentionen
dc.subjecteffects of trial historyen
dc.subject.programPsychologyen
dc.titleWhere Have You Been, What Did You See, and How Did You Get Here: Effects of Prior Trial History in the Context of Exogenous and Endogenous Spatial Cuingen
dc.typeMaster Thesisen
uws-etd.degreeMaster of Artsen
uws-etd.degree.departmentPsychologyen
uws.peerReviewStatusUnrevieweden
uws.scholarLevelGraduateen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
White_Darcy.pdf
Size:
1015.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.67 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections