Negotiating Borders:Bharat & Pakistan

Abstract

Often referred to as the “Line of Division,” the India-Pakistan border is a poignant representation of a once-united legacy now partitioned into two separate nations. As the annals of history rolled out, this division has remained a silent observer to the constant socio-political tensions that define the relationship between these countries. The physical markers of the boundary may not have changed significantly over time, but the symbolic divide has notably widened. Political machinations have largely steered the creation of narratives, leading to growing detachment in communities on both ends. The architectural imprints of this border, characterized by watchtowers, barriers, and checkpoints, amplify notions of division, vigilance, and caution. However, this design thesis seeks to reimagine this space, transitioning from an emblem of separation to a beacon of hope, unity, and potential reconciliation. This research undertakes a detailed examination of the architectural facets of the border, revealing the influence of these physical edifices not only in perpetuating division but also in molding perceptions and identities. Aligning the architectural stories of the India-Pakistan border with other global border designs unveils the transformative essence of design, demonstrating its power to turn conflict areas into hubs of mutual respect and cooperation. At the core of this thesis is an innovative architectural concept — a space derived from a blend of historical wisdom, present requirements, and future aspirations. Beyond its tangible presence, this design stands as a symbolic gesture, envisioning a future where borders serve as connectors, celebrating the shared cultural roots and destinies of inhabitants on either side. Recognizing the dynamic nature of the Line of Control’s geology and border, the thesis strategically emphasizes two distinct terrains: Land and Water. Rooted in their indigenous contexts yet influenced by global examples, this design thesis challenges the traditional view of borders as obstructions. Instead, it reinterprets them as facilitators, promoting dialogue, cultural exchanges, and mutual prosperity. Bearing in mind the initial human discord that led to the geographical split, this design aims to invert this dynamic, striving to unite individuals and bridge the gap. In its essence, this project doesn’t only propose an architectural innovation but kindles a broader conversation, advocating a rethinking of our modern relationship, interaction, and design approach to borders.