UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

COMPLAINTS ABOUT COVID: An Examination of the Structure and Properties of Complaints about COVID-19 Using Conversation Analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2023-04-28

Authors

Kull, Sandra Nathalie

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Waterloo

Abstract

In making a complaint, speakers attach a negative assessment to a person, an entity, or an event. Verbalizing such an assessment in interaction transforms a previously individual perception into one that they consider suitable to be negotiated with their interlocutors (Emerson & Messinger, 1977). Complaint recipients, on the other hand, can choose to support the assessment on an affective level or not (dis/affiliation) and to correspond with the complaint by producing structurally fitting responses (dis/alignment) (Pomerantz, 1975). Building on studies of complaints in English, French and Finnish, this thesis examines complaints in naturally occurring German conversation, specifically ones about COVID-19-related matters, using the method of Conversation Analysis. Data stem from the Leibniz Institute for the German Language’s Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus Deutsch (FOLK) and feature exclusively private telephone call interactions made between March 2020 and February 2021. From those, a collection of 25 complaint sequences was assembled. By means of the collection and eight detailed qualitative analyses of different complaint negotiations, the thesis examines the following research questions: 1) Which linguistic resources are employed by speakers to place complaint-initial first assessments? 2) How do recipients express and negotiate dis/agreement, in light of a conversational preference for agreement (Sacks, 1987; Auer & Uhmann, 1982)? 3) To what extent do speakers orient to their complaints and responses as potentially problematic or delicate (Jefferson, 1985)? Findings reveal speakers’ orientation to the delicacy of both placing and receiving complaints: Speakers draw on a variety of lexico-semantic, syntactic, prosodic and paralinguistic features to index the potentially problematic nature of complaining and formulate complaints in a way that they pose minimal threat to their own and others’ face (Brown & Levinson, 1987). Furthermore, disagreement in the form of disaffiliating second-position responses only rarely occurs and tends to be introduced implicitly. This confirms findings on complaints in other languages. Two new insights can be taken away from this thesis: Complaining speakers produce complaints about events using the same constitutive components as in complaints about people; describing the negative impact on themselves and blaming a third party for it. With respect to complaining about COVID-19-related events, a tendency towards implicitness regarding both components can be observed. With a broader scope and regarding the underlying social dynamics of interaction, it could be found that joint complaint activities about jointly experienced circumstances (such as COVID-19) seem to be pursued as a means of cultivating social relationships and solidarity, which is indicated, among other things, by the use of membership categories to signal connectedness.

Description

Keywords

conversation analysis, german, complaining, assessments, epistemic stance, affiliation, disaffiliation, alignment, disalignment, delicateness, face theory, social relationships

LC Keywords

Citation