Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiele, David B.
dc.contributor.authorScholer, Abigail A.
dc.contributor.authorFujita, Kentaro 18:49:46 (GMT) 18:49:46 (GMT)
dc.descriptionThe final publication is available at Elsevier via © 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
dc.description.abstractUntil recently, research examining the self-regulation of motivation focused primarily on the strategies people use to bolster the amount of motivation they have for pursuing a task goal. In contrast, our metamotivational framework highlights the importance of also examining if people recognize which qualitatively distinct types of motivation (e.g., promotion vs. prevention) are most helpful for achieving their goal, given the demands of the task or situation. At the heart of this framework is the idea that any given motivational state involves performance tradeoffs, such that it may be relatively beneficial for some tasks, but detrimental for others. In this piece, we review research suggesting that, on average, people (a) possess metamotivational knowledge of such tradeoffs (particularly those posited by regulatory focus theory, self-determination theory, and construal level theory), (b) recognize strategies that could be used to induce adaptive motivational states, and (c) implement this knowledge (at times) to increase the likelihood of performance success. We also discuss future directions for metamotivation research, including whether and when individual differences in metamotivational knowledge predict real-world outcomes, how such metamotivational knowledge develops, and whether there is a general metamotivational competency that predicts people’s sensitivity to a broad range of motivationally-relevant performance tradeoffs.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by funding from the Buehler Sesquicentennial Assistant Professorship, the James S. McDonnell Foundation (Collaborative Grant No. 220020483), the National Science Foundation (Grant #1626733), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant #435-2017-0184). The opinions expressed here are our own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizationsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAdvances in Motivation Science;7
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.subjectregulatory focusen
dc.subjectconstrual levelen
dc.titleMetamotivation: Emerging Research on the regulation of motivational statesen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMiele, D.B., Scholer, A.A., & Fujita, K. (2020). Metamotivation: Emerging research on the regulation of motivational states. Advances in Motivation Science, 7, 1-42.en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Artsen

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)


University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages