UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

Go on play with the words, the effect is the same: how gentrification and liveability feature in public discourses of neighbourhood change

Thumbnail Image

Files

Tolfo_Paolo.pdf (1.13 MB)

Date

2019-09-25

Authors

Tolfo, Paolo

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Waterloo

Abstract

Despite its association with displacement, gentrification remains a persuasive model for encouraging economic development and growth. For gentrification strategies to remain politically palatable, policy discourses mask the exclusionary consequences of neighbourhood (re)investment. These discourses suggest that neighbourhood improvements are equally distributed, anesthetizing critical understandings of gentrification. This thesis contributes to contemporary scholarship investigating the relationship between discourse and gentrification. It analyzes the extent to which public discourses of neighbourhood change comprehensively consider inequality, affordability, gentrification, and displacement; specifically, the extent to which displacement is recognized within public discourse as a consequence of neighbourhood change. Each chapter uses discourse and framing analysis to investigate an area of public discourse: in the first, media discourses; in the second, neighbourhood planning and policy language. Whereas gentrification researchers studying policy often target the policy discourse itself as the tool that silences critical reflection, this thesis demonstrates that media discourses – used as a proxy for mainstream discourses more broadly – have evicted critical class considerations. Public policy discourses, liveability in particular, then perpetuate this eviction to encourage the types of neighbourhood change that benefit affluent groups and accumulation. In order to reverse this process, planning and policy practitioners should acknowledge inequality, different experiences of neighbourhood change, and make minimizing displacement a primary policy objective.

Description

Keywords

gentrification, liveability, Vancouver, Downtown Eastside, displacement, neighbourhood plans, discourse

LC Keywords

Citation

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10012/15162

Collections

Theses
Planning