UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

What Works for Me May Not Work for You: Predicting Self-Compassionate Responding Using an Interactionist Approach

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2018-08-22

Authors

Waring, Sydney Vail

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Waterloo

Abstract

Objective: Self-compassion has both trait and state-like properties (Kelly & Stephen, 2016), yet little research has investigated how dispositional and contextual factors interact to influence someone’s ability to be self-compassionate in a given moment. One contextual factor known to influence self-compassion is how “shared” or common one’s problems seem to be (i.e., common humanity; Leary, Tate, Adams, Allen, & Hancock, 2007). The current study investigated whether contextual cues of common humanity moderated the effects of trait self-compassion and self-criticism on state self-compassion following a negative self-relevant event. Method: One-hundred-and-two undergraduates (89 females) completed a trait measure of self-criticism and self-compassion; underwent an induced negative self-relevant event and manipulation; and then completed the State Self-Compassion Scale, the State Shame Scale, and a measure of state affect. Following the negative event, participants received a contextual cue that led them to believe that a peer had experienced a similar event (Common Humanity condition) or had not (Alone condition). Results: Condition moderated the effects of both trait self-compassion and self-criticism on state self-compassion. Higher trait self-compassion was a stronger predictor of adaptive responses to the negative event (i.e., higher state self-compassion, higher positive affect, and lower shame) in the Common Humanity condition than in the Alone condition. However, higher trait self-criticism was related to more maladaptive responses (e.g., lower state self-compassion and positive affect) in the Common Humanity condition compared to the Alone condition. Discussion: The current study supported the importance of applying an interactionist perspective to the study of self-compassion and self-criticism and results suggest that interpersonal contexts that may facilitate self-compassionate responding for self-compassionate individuals, could in fact thwart self-compassion for those who are more self-critical.

Description

Keywords

self-compassion, self-criticism, interactionism, interpersonal context, common humanity, shame

LC Keywords

Citation

Collections