Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYao, Lin
dc.contributor.authorSheng, Xinjun
dc.contributor.authorMrachacz-Kersting, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Xiangyang
dc.contributor.authorFarina, Dario
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Ning
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-06 15:47:49 (GMT)
dc.date.available2017-11-06 15:47:49 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2017-11-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2769686
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/12612
dc.description© 2017 IEEE.Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes,creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.en
dc.description.abstractA large proportion of users do not achieve adequate control using current non-invasive Brain-computer Interfaces (BCI). This issue has being coined “BCI-Illiteracy”, and is observed among BCI modalities. Here, we compare the performance and BCI-illiteracy rate of tactile selective sensation (SS) and motor imagery (MI) BCI, for large subject samples. We analyzed 80 experimental sessions from 57 subjects with two-class SS protocols. For SS, the group average performance was 79.8±10.6%, with 43 out of the 57 subjects (75.4%) exceeding the 70% BCI-illiteracy threshold for left and right hand SS discrimination. When compared to previous results, this tactile BCI outperformed all other tactile BCIs currently available. We also analyzed 63 experiment sessions from 43 subjects with two-class MI BCI protocols, where the group average performance was 77.2±13.3%, with 69.7% of the subjects exceeded the 70% performance threshold for left and right hand MI. For within-subject comparison, the 24 subjects who participated to both the SS and MI experiments, the BCI performance was superior with SS than MI especially in beta frequency band (p<0.05), with enhanced R2 discriminative information in the somatosensory cortex for the SS modality. Both SS and MI showed a functional dissociation between lower alpha ([8 10] Hz) and upper alpha ([10 13] Hz) bands, with BCI performance significantly better in the upper alpha than the lower alpha (p<0.05) band. In summary, we demonstrated that SS is a promising BCI modality with low BCI illiteracy issue, and has great potential in practical applications reaching large population.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity Starter Grant of the University of Waterloo [No. 203859]en
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 51620105002]en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen
dc.subjectElectroencephalographyen
dc.subjectProtocolsen
dc.subjectVibrationsen
dc.subjectVisualizationen
dc.subjectWristen
dc.subjectSteady-stateen
dc.titlePerformance of Brain-Computer Interfacing Based on Tactile Selective Sensation and Motor Imageryen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationYao, L., Sheng, X., Mrachacz-Kersting, N., Zhu, X., Farina, D., & Jiang, N. (2017). Performance of Brain-Computer Interfacing Based on Tactile Selective Sensation and Motor Imagery. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, PP(99), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2769686en
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineeringen
uws.contributor.affiliation2Systems Design Engineeringen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusRevieweden
uws.scholarLevelFacultyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages