Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTerry, Jacob Ross
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-25 20:35:44 (GMT)
dc.date.available2017-08-25 20:35:44 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2017-08-25
dc.date.submitted2017-08-23
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/12222
dc.description.abstractPublic-sector infrastructure funding is a complex and often unclear process. Cities operate most efficiently if there is an adequately-funded transportation network with which residents and visitors can easily travel from origin to destination. Building these networks comes with challenges, which are often rooted in funding concerns. Part of this may be due to deficient understanding among the public and in governments about how transportation is truly funded, due to the opaque nature of many elements of government funding flows. This research addresses a need for methods that improve the transparency and fiscal sustainability of transportation infrastructure. Financial flows across governments are disaggregated and mapped across four tiers of infrastructure – federal, provincial, regional, and local – using the circular flow diagram as the base framework, to provide an understanding of how governments receive and spend funds. Origin revenues for water and transportation infrastructure in Waterloo, Ontario are determined, then the benefit model, which links revenues with effective expenditures, is used to evaluate whether the origin revenue sources being used to pay for each infrastructure system is effective. A sustainability analysis is then conducted for Waterloo and Toronto, comparing road and transit funding against the rate of infrastructure growth. The results suggest that water revenue in Waterloo is well-linked to the infrastructure, roads and active transportation are somewhat well-linked, and transit is not linked as well. Roads could be better linked if technology is implemented that allows better tracking of independent vehicles in urban settings. Roads in Waterloo and Toronto were found to be somewhat sustainably funded, although they trended in opposite directions, and transit funding was found to be less sustainably funded in Toronto, and somewhat sustainably funded in Waterloo pending the completion of the ION rapid transit system.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Waterlooen
dc.subjecttransportation infrastructureen
dc.subjectpublic economicsen
dc.subjectpublic transportationen
dc.subjectroadsen
dc.subjectCity of Waterlooen
dc.subjectCity of Torontoen
dc.subjectRegion of Waterlooen
dc.subjecttransport economicsen
dc.titleImproving the Fiscal Transparency and Sustainability of Public-Sector Transportation Infrastructureen
dc.typeMaster Thesisen
dc.pendingfalse
uws-etd.degree.departmentCivil and Environmental Engineeringen
uws-etd.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen
uws-etd.degree.grantorUniversity of Waterlooen
uws-etd.degreeMaster of Applied Scienceen
uws.contributor.advisorBachmann, Chris
uws.contributor.advisorCasello, Jeffrey
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Engineeringen
uws.published.cityWaterlooen
uws.published.countryCanadaen
uws.published.provinceOntarioen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusUnrevieweden
uws.scholarLevelGraduateen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages