Accounting and Finance
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/9868
This is the collection for the University of Waterloo's School of Accounting and Finance.
Research outputs are organized by type (eg. Master Thesis, Article, Conference Paper).
Waterloo faculty, students, and staff can contact us or visit the UWSpace guide to learn more about depositing their research.
Browse
Browsing Accounting and Finance by Subject "accounting"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item How do tax and accounting policies affect cross-border mergers and acquisitions?(University of Waterloo, 2007-09-21T20:00:28Z) Mescall, DevanUsing a large sample of mergers and acquisitions from 27 countries over a 16-year period, I investigate how differences in tax and financial reporting policies affect the premium and structure of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. I find evidence that firms pay a premium to reduce the tax risk associated with strict transfer pricing rules. Further analysis segments acquisitions into those that are strictly financial versus those that are more strategic. Financial acquisitions are those where the acquirer is making the purchase for investment purposes rather than strategic reasons. These financial transactions generally lead to less integration between the two companies and therefore less inter-company transactions involving transfer pricing. Evidence based on this segmentation suggests that only differences in transfer pricing risk for non-financial acquisitions are priced. The results suggest that while on average non-financial acquirers will pay a higher premium to reduce transfer pricing risk regardless of industry, only those in highly scrutinized industries with high levels of intangibles, such as pharmaceuticals, will demand a discount for transactions which increase transfer pricing risk. In tests of acquisition structure, I find that shareholder-level capital gain taxes influence the structure of an acquisition. The influence of shareholder-level taxes is reduced by the presence of information asymmetry concerning the acquirer’s stock value. However, higher quality financial reporting reduces information asymmetry and improves the tax efficiency of acquisition structure providing tangible economic benefit to shareholders.Item Tax Incentives in Corporate Acquisitions(University of Waterloo, 2021-09-30) Warraich, HamzaIn this dissertation, I examine tax incentives in corporate acquisitions. Reported tax losses or net operating losses (NOLs) under the United States (U.S.) income tax law have grown considerably in recent years. Yet, there is limited empirical evidence on whether target firms’ NOL carry-forward (NOLC), which is a potential tax asset, affects merger and acquisition (M&A) activity. I re-examine two open empirical questions in the literature for which there is limited or no empirical evidence. First, does the acquirer compensate the target’s shareholders for the target’s NOLC? I predict and find that the association between the target’s NOLC and acquisition premium is increasing in the acquirer’s marginal tax rate. Second, does the target’s NOLC affect how the acquisition is financed? Consistent with capital structure theory on the substitutability of debt and non-debt tax shields, I find that the probability of debt financing is relatively lower in deals in which the target has an NOLC. In accordance with the Scholes-Wolfson framework, of “all taxes, all parties, and all costs”, a key insight in this dissertation is that the tax and non-tax attributes of the target and acquirer firm interact to determine the available tax incentive and thus the optimal level of tax-planning. This dissertation also provides new insight into the distortionary effect of tax policy. NOLC-related tax incentives in corporate acquisitions are governed by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. §382 imposes a loss limitation on firms’ tax attributes following an ownership change, effectively reducing the net present value (NPV) of the tax assets. Empirically, I document that the uncertainty inherent in the applicability of §382 rules increases the likelihood that a deal is cancelled. In addition, I find that §382 is an important determinant in the medium of exchange and that the applicability of loss limitation rules is a plausible explanation for the well-documented aggregate trend in the decline in the propensity of all-stock deals. My findings suggest that §382 creates serious and unintended distortions in the merger decision, the effects of which are economically large.