UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

The Complexity of Finding Dense Subgraphs in Graphs with Large Cliques

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2021-08-25

Authors

Seth, Cameron

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Waterloo

Abstract

The GapDensest-k-Subgraph(d) problem (GapDkS(d)) is defined as follows: given a graph G and parameters k,d, distinguish between the case that G contains a k-clique, and the case that every k-subgraph of G has density at most d. GapDkS(d) is a natural relaxation of the standard Clique problem, which is known to be NP-complete. For d very close to 1, the GapDkS(d) problem is equivalent to the Clique problem, and when d is very close to 0 the GapDkS(d) problem can easily be solved in polynomial time. However, despite much work on both the algorithmic and hardness front, the exact k and d parameter values for which GapDkS(d) can be solved in polynomial time are still unknown. In particular, the best polynomial-time algorithms can solve GapDkS(d) when d is an inverse polynomial in the number of vertices n, but there have been no NP-hardness results beyond the trivial result. This thesis attempts to understand the GapDkS(d) problem better by studying the case when k is restricted to be linear in n (where n is the number of vertices in G). In particular, we survey the GapDkS(d) algorithms and hardness results that can be best applied to this restriction in an attempt to determine the threshold for when the problem becomes NP-hard. With some modifications to the algorithms and proofs, we produce algorithms and hardness results for the GapDkS(d) problem with k linear in n. In addition, we study the connection between GapDkS(d) and MaxClique, and show that despite having strong hardness results for MaxClique, reductions from MaxClique do not give strong hardness bounds for GapDkS(d).

Description

Keywords

approximation algorithms, NP Hardness, densest k-subgraph

LC Keywords

Citation