UWSpace is currently experiencing technical difficulties resulting from its recent migration to a new version of its software. These technical issues are not affecting the submission and browse features of the site. UWaterloo community members may continue submitting items to UWSpace. We apologize for the inconvenience, and are actively working to resolve these technical issues.
 

Models of Deterministic and Stochastic Comparison: Two Studies in Applied Operations Research

Thumbnail Image

Files

Burgess_KieferJoe.pdf (8.74 MB)

Date

2023-08-29

Authors

Burgess, Kiefer Joe

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Waterloo

Abstract

This dissertation includes two essays on applications of management science methods to modelling service systems and developing novel improvements to sports team ranking systems. The first essay proposes a novel approach to modelling changes in business procedures that have neither explicitly positive nor explicitly negative effects on operational performance, but are changes to operating rules; we call these procedure changes Operational Protocol Modifications (OPMs). Our approach is to model these OPMs via distributional censoring. Using the scenario of a technical support employee at a SaaS firm, we model changes in OPMs as censoring effects on the distributions of both service quality and service time. We demonstrate the nonlinear effects OPMs can have on the optimal service contract and the employer's (principal's) expected utility in hiring the technical support employee (agent), under certain distributional assumptions. This modelling approach arms operations management analysts with a new tool to better capture the impact of OPMs and their non-linear impacts on operational performance. The second essay proposes a number of additions to both static and dynamic network ranking models for professional soccer teams. We introduce ways to incorporate relevant home/away game status and goal difference information. Further, we introduce a collection of methods to measure the competitive similarity between teams, which we then integrate into the ranking systems. We demonstrate, using a large collection of data on five of the top European professional soccer leagues, that our methods produce superior empirical performance when compared to comparable approaches. Importantly, our work is the first to integrate the competitive similarity notion directly into network ranking models, providing the first direct link between two related bodies of literature.

Description

Keywords

mechanism design, ranking models, game theory, network models, operations research, censoring

LC Keywords

Citation

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10012/19794

Collections

Theses
Management Sciences