Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMikhail, Monika
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09 20:54:05 (GMT)
dc.date.available2023-01-09 20:54:05 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2023-01-09
dc.date.submitted2022-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/19043
dc.description.abstractThe built sector is responsible for 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions, which inspired solutions including net-zero energy buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Several factors impact energy consumption including finetuning activities that take place after construction and how occupants interact with different building components. Many building energy studies take a simulation approach to estimate energy performance. There are limited studies looking at empirical office operations, especially in Northern climates. This study investigated a case study building in Waterloo, Ontario, using quantitative energy data from three and a half years of building operation and qualitative data from key informant interviews to gain a holistic understanding of building operations. The investigation was divided in two main parts, answering questions related to the performance gap, building commissioning and COVID-19. Firstly, the difference between predictions of energy consumption from the design phase and measured energy consumption was investigated. Actions taken by the building operator to close the difference between measured and predicted heating, ventilating and air conditioning energy consumption and work towards meeting the design intent were analyzed. In the second portion of the study, the focus shifted towards more occupant impacted loads such as lighting and plug loads (e.g., computers, fridges, personal space heaters). Energy consumption from 2019 was considered as the baseline and it was compared to minimal occupancy in 2021 and medium occupancy due to increased remote working during 2022. Statistical analysis was completed to test the significance of the differences in the energy consumption levels between the three modes of occupancy. Lastly, hourly profiles were analyzed to estimate occupant presence and schedules during typical work and nonwork days. Highlights of the results show that building commissioning reduced total energy consumption by 15%, while reduced occupancy led to a 10% decrease. Low sensitivity to outdoor conditions (e.g., irradiance and outdoor temperature) on energy consumption was also observed. Future research can consider investigating commissioning projects’ energy savings from other Canadian offices with similar design goals (e.g., net-zero energy) and uncovering a relationship between occupancy (i.e., uncovered through occupant sensor data) and energy consumption.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Waterlooen
dc.titleA net-positive energy building assessment: commissioning and COVID-19 insightsen
dc.typeMaster Thesisen
dc.pendingfalse
uws-etd.degree.departmentSchool of Environment, Enterprise and Developmenten
uws-etd.degree.disciplineSustainability Managementen
uws-etd.degree.grantorUniversity of Waterlooen
uws-etd.degreeMaster of Environmental Studiesen
uws-etd.embargo.terms0en
uws.contributor.advisorParker, Paul
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Environmenten
uws.published.cityWaterlooen
uws.published.countryCanadaen
uws.published.provinceOntarioen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusUnrevieweden
uws.scholarLevelGraduateen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages