Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTimoney, Seton
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-17 13:55:08 (GMT)
dc.date.available2019-12-17 13:55:08 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2019-12-17
dc.date.submitted2019-11-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/15330
dc.description.abstractIn the quest for satisfying close relationships, one is left vulnerable to hurt and rejection. For people with lower self-esteem (LSEs), such rejection seems unavoidable. To steel themselves against this inescapable hurt, LSEs pre-emptively self-protect by psychologically distancing themselves from their partners and relationships at the slightest hint that their relationship may be threatened. People with higher self-esteem (HSEs), who do not view rejection as inevitable, instead remain psychologically close and connected to their partners and relationships, even when they feel that their relationship security has been threatened. These different responses to relationship threats have consequences for the health and stability of close relationships, and it is therefore important to understand the situations and dispositions that predict them. In the present research, I examined two traits—self-esteem and agreeableness—that I predicted would be associated with responses to relationship threats. I expected that, following a relationship threat, LSEs who were higher in agreeableness would actually respond to relationship threats in the same way that HSEs do—by connecting with their partners and relationships. I predicted that only less agreeable LSEs would engage in self-protection following a relationship threat. Although the results were more complicated than I had predicted, over four experiments, I found that the effects of self-esteem on risk regulation processes can vary with one’s level of agreeableness. Specifically, being higher in agreeableness can at times allow LSEs to remain connected in the face of threats to their relationships. In fact, agreeableness may be even more important for risk regulation than is self-esteem. Although unexpected, the results of the present studies also suggest that less agreeable HSEs may share some characteristics of narcissism. Notably, I was unable to replicate the typical self-esteem by condition effect found in risk regulation research. Future research should examine the boundary conditions on agreeableness and self-esteem as resources for connection following relationship threats.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Waterlooen
dc.subjectsocial psychologyen
dc.subjectclose relationshipsen
dc.subjectself-esteemen
dc.subjectagreeablenessen
dc.subjectpersonalityen
dc.titleWhen Being Agreeable Matters: The Importance of Agreeableness (and Self-Esteem) for Risk Regulation in Close Relationshipsen
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisen
dc.pendingfalse
uws-etd.degree.departmentPsychologyen
uws-etd.degree.disciplinePsychologyen
uws-etd.degree.grantorUniversity of Waterlooen
uws-etd.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen
uws.contributor.advisorWood, Joanne
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Artsen
uws.published.cityWaterlooen
uws.published.countryCanadaen
uws.published.provinceOntarioen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusUnrevieweden
uws.scholarLevelGraduateen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages