Kafer, Sean2022-09-012022-09-012022-09-012022-08-28http://hdl.handle.net/10012/18705The Simplex method is the most popular algorithm for solving linear programs (LPs). Geometrically, it moves from an initial vertex solution to an improving neighboring one, selected according to a pivot rule. Despite decades of study, it is still not known whether there exists a pivot rule that makes the Simplex method run in polynomial time. Circuit-augmentation algorithms are generalizations of the Simplex method, where in each step one is allowed to move along a fixed set of directions, called the circuits, that is a superset of the edges of a polytope. The number of circuit augmentations has been of interest as a proxy for the number of steps in the Simplex method, and the circuit-diameter of polyhedra has been studied as a lower bound to the combinatorial diameter of polyhedra. We show that in the circuit-augmentation framework the Greatest Improvement and Dantzig pivot rules are NP-hard, even for 0/1 LPs. On the other hand, the Steepest Descent pivot rule can be carried out in polynomial time in the 0/1 setting, and the number of circuit augmentations required to reach an optimal solution according to this rule is strongly-polynomial for 0/1 LPs. We introduce a new rule in the circuit-augmentation framework which we call Asymmetric Steepest Descent. We show both that it can be computed in polynomial time and that it reaches an optimal solution of an LP in a polynomial number of augmentations. It was not previously known that such a rule was possible. We further show a weakly-polynomial bound on the circuit diameter of rational polyhedra. We next show that the circuit-augmentation framework can be exploited to make novel conclusions about the classical Simplex method itself: In particular, as a byproduct of our circuit results, we prove that (i) computing the shortest (monotone) path to an optimal solution on the 1-skeleton of a polytope is NP-hard, and hard to approximate within a factor better than 2, and (ii) for 0/1-LPs (i.e., those whose vertex solutions are in {0, 1}^n), a monotone path of strongly-polynomial length can be constructed using steepest improving edges. Inspired by this, we further examine the lengths of other monotone paths generated by some local decision rules – which we call edge rules – including two modifications of the classical Shadow Vertex pivot rule. We leverage the techniques we use for analyzing edge rules to devise pivot rules for the Simplex method on 0/1-LPs that generate the same monotone paths as their edge rule counterparts. In particular, this shows that there exist pivot rules for the Simplex method on 0/1 LPs that reach an optimal solution by performing only a polynomial number of non-degenerate pivots, answering an open question in the literature.enlinear programmingcombinatorial optimizationSimplexcircuit diametercombinatorial diametermonotone diameterDoctoral Thesis