Bakos Lang, Elena2019-07-302019-07-302019-07-302019-07-18http://hdl.handle.net/10012/14832We present a framework for evaluating the concrete security assurances of cryptographic constructions given by the worst-case SIVP_γ to average-case SIS_{n,m,q,β} reductions. As part of this analysis, we present the tightness gaps for three worst-case SIVP_γ to average-case SIS_{n,m,q,β} reductions. We also analyze the hardness of worst-case SIVP_γ instances. We apply our methodology to two SIS-based signature schemes, and compute the security guarantees that these systems get from reductions to worst-case SIVP_γ. We find that most of the presented reductions do not apply to the chosen parameter sets for the signature schemes. We propose modifications to the schemes to make the reductions applicable, and find that the worst-case security assurances of the (modified) signature schemes are, for both signature schemes, significantly lower than the amount of security previously claimed.enMaster Thesis