Gamble, John-MichaelDonnan, Jennifer R.Chibrikov, EugeneTwells, Laurie K.Midodzi, William K.Majumdar, Sumit R.2018-01-122018-01-122018-02-01https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2017.12.008http://hdl.handle.net/10012/12848Published by Elsevier via http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.10.035 © 2017. This final version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Aims Mixed evidence exists for the effect of incretin-based therapies on osteoporosis in type-2 diabetes. Therefore, we conducted a cohort study to determine the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and common osteoporotic “fragility fractures” (upper extremity, hip, spine).Methods The UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink was used to identify adults without prior fractures receiving a new anti-diabetic drug or a new type-2 diabetes diagnosis between 2007 and 2016. The primary aim was to compare new-users of DPP-4 inhibitors versus new-users of sulfonylureas (SU). The association between DPP-4 inhibitors and incident fractures was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Deciles of high-dimensional propensity scores and other anti-diabetic drugs were used as covariates. Results We identified 7993 and 26,636 new-users of DPP-4 inhibitors and SUs, respectively. At cohort entry, the mean age was 58.8, 40% were female, mean diabetes duration was 1.3 years, and 42% had A1c > 9%. Over 9 years (mean follow-up = 1.2 years), the incident rate of fragility fractures was lower among DPP-4 versus SU users (3.0/1000 vs. 5.2/1000 person-years; P-value = 0.007). After adjustment, there was no statistically significant difference in fracture risk (hazard ratio adjusted, aHR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.51–1.24; P-value = 0.3125). In a secondary analysis, DPP-4 inhibitors were not associated with a difference in fracture risk compared to insulin (aHR = 0.91, 95%CI 0.40–2.09); however were associated with a lower fracture risk versus thiazolidinediones (aHR = 0.47, 95%CI 0.26–0.83). Sensitivity analyses supported findings. Conclusions DPP-4 inhibitors are not associated with an increased risk of fragility fractures compared with SUs or insulin; however, are associated with a lower risk versus thiazolidinediones.enAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalCohort studyType 2 diabetesDipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitorsFractureThe risk of fragility fractures in new users of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors compared to sulfonylureas and other anti-diabetic drugs: A cohort studyArticle