Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOakes, Harrison
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-22 18:43:32 (GMT)
dc.date.available2020-04-22 18:43:32 (GMT)
dc.date.issued2020-04-22
dc.date.submitted2020-03-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10012/15781
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation, I articulate a theory of identity suspicion, informed by research on attribution theory’s discounting principle (Kelley, 1971) and on suspicious mindsets (Fein, Hilton, & Miller, 1990). Identity suspicion is a function of concealable identity and social environments that stigmatize (i.e., socially mark; Brekhus, 1996) the concealable identity. Such stigmatizing environments incentivize concealing (i.e., closeting) the marked identity. The awareness of this incentivized closet creates suspicion around actors’ claims to the contrasting unmarked identity because these claims have at least two plausible causes (i.e., self-protection or authentic self-expression). To resolve their suspicion, people become close observers of each other’s behaviors, looking for attributes that are socially coded as cues of the contrasting marked identity. Where observed, these attributes augment the identity suspicion produced by actors’ claims to the contrasting unmarked identity. Across nine experimental studies (N = 2467), I found consistent support for my theory of identity suspicion. Participants were more suspicious of an actor’s claim to an unmarked concealable identity (e.g., being straight) when he was situated in an environment that stigmatized (vs. affirmed) the contrasting concealable identity (e.g., homophobic environment stigmatizing being gay). As expected, observers in the stigmatizing environment reported more identity suspicion when I described the actor as having certain attributes stereotypically associated with the stigmatized identity. However, even when the actor’s attributes were stereotypically associated with the contrasting non-stigmatized identity, observers in the identity-stigmatizing (vs. –affirming) environment still expressed suspicion of his identity claim (Study 3). In Studies 4a-5, I found that observers’ perception of the actor’s motivation to conceal behaviors or attributes stereotyped as cues of the stigmatized identity mediated the social environmental effect on identity suspicion. These results support my theorizing and suggest observers intuitively recognize how identity-stigmatizing environments create secondary closets in which, to avoid suspicion they possess the stigmatized identity, everyone is incentivized to conceal behaviors and attributes stereotyped as cues of the stigmatized identity.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Waterlooen
dc.subjectidentity suspicionen
dc.subjectsuspicious mindsetsen
dc.subjectdiscounting principleen
dc.subjectattribution theoryen
dc.subjectsexualityen
dc.subjectgender nonconformityen
dc.subjecthomophobiaen
dc.subjectperson perceptionen
dc.subject.lcshHomophobiaen
dc.subject.lcshSuspicionen
dc.subject.lcshAttribution (Social psychology)en
dc.subject.lcshSexen
dc.subject.lcshGender nonconformityen
dc.subject.lcshPerceptionen
dc.titleClosets Breed Suspicion: Environments that Stigmatize Concealable Identities Raise Doubts about Claims to Contrasting Non-Stigmatized Identitiesen
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisen
dc.pendingfalse
uws-etd.degree.departmentPsychologyen
uws-etd.degree.disciplinePsychologyen
uws-etd.degree.grantorUniversity of Waterlooen
uws-etd.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen
uws.contributor.advisorEibach, Richard
uws.contributor.affiliation1Faculty of Artsen
uws.published.cityWaterlooen
uws.published.countryCanadaen
uws.published.provinceOntarioen
uws.typeOfResourceTexten
uws.peerReviewStatusUnrevieweden
uws.scholarLevelGraduateen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


UWSpace

University of Waterloo Library
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
519 888 4883

All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

DSpace software

Service outages