University of Waterloo >
Electronic Theses and Dissertations (UW) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Feature selection and artifact removal in sleep stage classification|
|Authors: ||Hapuarachchi, Pasan|
|Keywords: ||Electrical & Computer Engineering|
|Approved Date: ||2006 |
|Date Submitted: ||2006 |
|Abstract: ||The use of Electroencephalograms (EEG) are essential to the analysis of sleep disorders in patients. With the use of electroencephalograms, electro-oculograms (EOG), and electromyograms (EMG), doctors and EEG technician can make conclusions about the sleep patterns of patients. In particular, the classification of the sleep data into various stages, such as NREM I-IV, REM, Awake, is extremely important. The EEG signal itself is highly sensitive to physiological and non-physiological artifacts. Trained human experts can accommodate for these artifacts while they are analyzing the EEG signal. |
However, if some of these artifacts are removed prior to analysis, their job will be become easier. Furthermore, one of the biggest motivations, of our team's research is the construction of a portable device that can analyze the sleep data as they are being collected. For this task, the sleep data must be analyzed completely automatically in order to make the classifications.
The research presented in this thesis concerns itself with the denoising and the feature selection aspects of the teams' goals. Since humans are able to process artifacts and ignore them prior to classification, an automated system should have the same capabilities or close to them. As such, the denoising step is performed to condition the data prior to any other stages of the sleep stage neoclassicisms. As mentioned before, the denoising step, by itself, is useful to human EEG technicians as well.
The denoising step in this research mainly looks at EOG artifacts and artifacts isolated to a single EEG channel, such as electrode pop artifacts. The first two algorithms uses Wavelets exclusively (BWDA and WDA), while the third algorithm is a mixture of Wavelets and In- dependent Component Analysis (IDA). With the BWDA algorithm, determining consistent thresholds proved to be a difficult task. With the WDA algorithm, the performance was better, since the selection of the thresholds was more straight-forward and since there was more control over defining the duration of the artifacts. The IDA algorithm performed inferior to the WDA algorithm. This could have been due to the small number of measurement channels or the automated sub-classifier used to select the denoised EEG signal from the set of ICA demixed signals.
The feature selection stage is extremely important as it selects the most pertinent features to make a particular classification. Without such a step, the classifier will have to process useless data, which might result in a poorer classification. Furthermore, unnecessary features will take up valuable computer cycles as well. In a portable device, due to battery consumption, wasting computer cycles is not an option. The research presented in this thesis shows the importance of a systematic feature selection step in EEG classification. The feature selection step produced excellent results with a maximum use of just 5 features. During automated classification, this is extremely important as the automated classifier will only have to calculate 5 features for each given epoch.
|Department: ||Electrical and Computer Engineering|
|Degree: ||Master of Applied Science|
|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Engineering Theses and Dissertations |
Electronic Theses and Dissertations (UW)
This item is protected by original copyright
All items in UWSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.